tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1635136647154563060.post3668633592042184144..comments2020-01-08T21:28:15.157-08:00Comments on Healing Cancer with Logic and Reason: My Answer to... "Six stubborn myths about cancer".Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1635136647154563060.post-37051851920260936232013-12-16T16:13:15.298-08:002013-12-16T16:13:15.298-08:00Great comment, and points well made. Such people g...Great comment, and points well made. Such people get paid handsomely (by the press) to write this type of stuff. It sounds clever, but on closer inspection, mostly falls apart. This is because it relies heavily on distortion. <br /><br />Thanks for your support. If you wish, you can send your article / file to: logicalhealing@gmail.com<br /><br />richiewesthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14513667658185682354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1635136647154563060.post-63710148897192132022013-12-16T11:48:22.050-08:002013-12-16T11:48:22.050-08:00Dear Mr. West. Very good article for encouraging a...Dear Mr. West. Very good article for encouraging an objective and logical perspective. You might be interested to know that I also found the article by David Robert Grimes to be logically inconsistent - several straw man arguments and red herrings. Futhermore, I found the use of the word ´myth´in the title to the article rather deceptive - akin perhaps to semantic trickery, whether David Robert Grimes was aware of it or not. Furthermore still, I found the story at the start of his article rather irrelevant and at odds with scientific inquiry - almost ´bully-ish´ in the apparent desire to bias readers into thinking that conventional treatment is the only responsible route to consider. The article ends up polarising the discussion when, in fact, the truth is undoubtedly an integration of conventional and natural treatments. I wrote an article with many similar arguments to the ones that you make. Would you like me to send it to you? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com