Toxic Cancer Treatments Exposed as Lethal

Toxic Cancer Treatments Kill 15,000 Patients Every Year in UK Alone...

Further evidence as to the harmful effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy...(if any more were needed)

Medicine is now a high risk industry, like aviation. But, the chance of dying in an aviation accident is one in 2 million, while the risk of dying from a medical accident is one in 200!"

--Dr. Leape of the Harvard Medical School of Public Health

Sadly, a lot of highly effective
 alternative cancer treatments and protocols are being completely ignored due to political correctness and gross ignorance. They have been so ruthlessly suppressed and mocked, that it is political suicide to even suggest that they may offer hope. Yet toxic cancer treatments that wreck the immune system and damage vital organs are seen as "state of the art medicine" that cannot be questioned. But now at least someone in authority is trying to get things changed, so that more innovative approaches might be applied. That man is Lord Saatchi.


The Daily Telegraph reports: (Figures below refer to UK)

15,000 people die every year because of cancer treatments, Lord Saatchi says

More than 15,000 people die every year because of cancer treatments rather than the illness itself, Lord Saatchi has said.

Cancer drugs and radiotherapy weaken the immune system, leaving patients vulnerable to potentially fatal infections.

Lord Saatchi told the House of Lords: "What we do know is that the cancer drugs do such damage to the immune system that the patient is helpless to resist fatal infections like E.coli or MRSA or septicemia."

(He could have listed many more ways that these treatments can lead to death)

He later told The Daily Telegraph: "No one is to blame for this. The reason that doctors give patients these very damaging drugs is because there is nothing else."

Lord Saatchi has introduced a Medical Innovation Bill in the House of Lords, which intends to encourage doctors to come up with more creative forms of treatment.

 In other words, in the current system doctors cannot deviate from standardized practice, for fear of legal consequences, or charges for medical malpractice. However, the status quo guarantees no new breakthroughs that might otherwise come to light or show promise. This is the point if the Bill.

But is there really "nothing else"?

As might be expected, no real mention of alternative cancer treatments...which seem to be taboo in the higher realms of  Society and Government. This is perhaps due to an education system that rightly values experts and science, but unfortunately such highly paid, highly regarded experts, cannot admit to going in the wrong direction for decades, costing many billions of dollars, and millions of lives....even though it obviously has done! .A BIT LIKE THE IRAQ WAR!!!   A BIT LIKE THE BANKING SYSTEM... Expert's never get anything wrong!!!

Full Telegraph Story Here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10069585/15000-people-die-every-year-because-of-cancer-treatments-Lord-Saatchi-says.html

What is the REALITY of modern cancer treatment?

To Further Quote Lord Saatchi:

Driven by what he sees as the primitive reality of the cancer ward. (While visiting his sick wife before she died)

Quote: on modern cancer treatment.(Not pleasant)

“I have witnessed scenes that would not be permitted in a Hollywood horror movie.” Hair loss may be the most obvious side-effect but it is the least appalling. The drugs mimic the disease, causing nausea, diarrhoea, vomiting, fatigue. “Worst of all, they cause such damage to the immune system that the woman is as likely to die from the treatment as from the cancer itself.”

“Have you ever seen a chemotherapy room in a hospital? I hope you haven’t. It’s death row. If you were to lift her gown, you would see that the woman’s arm makes a heroin addict’s arm look attractive. There are so many attachments. What you have here is a situation where the woman is first tortured and then dies. Why? Because this is what is required by law. If doctors don’t stick to standard procedure, the consequences are that they could lose their livelihood, their reputation, and face ruin. So they are obliged to repeat a failed experiment over and over again. “Josephine had chemotherapy and a gigantic operation and every procedure you can imagine; every 'oscopy’ there is. Grotesque. Medieval.”

Full Telegraph Story here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10024231/I-was-a-desperate-lover-trying-to-save-his-love.html

The above account is extremely similar to the experience of Bill Henderson and the fate suffered by his first wife, who is said to have been killed by the treatment, not cancer itself. This consequently spurred him to look for answers, and tireless research into credible alternative cancer treatments. 

The Bill Henderson Protocol:

The above horror sums up perfectly why I chose to try alternative cancer treatments! (Primarily the Bill Henderson Protocol).

With the Bill Henderson Protocol you simply take a range of known non-toxic cancer fighting foods and suppliments that build your immune system and heal you from the inside, enjoying tasty natural foods etc that clean your system and make it alkaline, whereas most cancer patients are strongly acidic. To learn more about the Bill Henderson Protocol go here!

Many doctors are beginnng to see the light. Some have written books on alternative approaches. I will list my favourite ones shortly.

Incidentally, I was made aware of this long ago. Partly because I made it my business to read extensively on the subject, and secondly because the small-print on the chemotherapy form I was given to sign, stated "Estimated chance of death due to this drug treatment is 1 in 200 to 1 in 500", - or words to that effect. But it went on to say that this danger is far outweighed by your chances of dying due to your cancer. (I must add that this chemotherapy was a new TRIAL drug, so where they got their estimates from is anyones guess.)