Thursday, 23 May 2013

"Miraculous" Cancer Survivors Largely Ignored by Cancer Industry.



Healing cancer with logic and reason is about the clash of ideas for treating cancer. My aim is to explain the logic behind choosing alternative cancer treatments, as I did.

Imagine that you are tasked with the job of finding the cure for cancer. Imagine that your very life depends on it...

Here are some suggestions:
Instead of focusing almost all efforts on mice and rats, which eat a very different diet, (and are usually bred to be genetically prone to cancer, which makes them a very different organism than us) focus on HUMANS... to find out exactly what is going on, and why some humans survive cancer without standard treatment or drugs.

Example: There are many people who have had “spontaneous remission” from cancer, and a good many that have beat cancer through diet and/or other natural alternative treatments. Yet these are universally ignored and never questioned by anybody, or so they say. This type of event is normally dismissed as a fluke, or a freak event, and so considered as of no real scientific importance. A huge resource is being totally wasted. (Smell arrogance anyone? Or is it the lack of money-making potential?)  Want proof?

Surely it would be useful to study and analyse these important cases, and, “REVERSE-ENGINEER”- (so to speak) - data so as to discover what may have taken place to explain this type of phenomenon. By doing this intense study of various HUMAN people that have eliminated their cancer, some common elements might come to light. Some pennies may start to drop. Surely such people should be the subject of intense study?


THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEATEN CANCER.... CANCER HAS GONE INTO REVERSE.... CANCER HAS BEEN EXTINGUISHED... CANCER HAS DISAPPEARED!!! Many of these people had been declared terminal, with only weeks to live!  But these events are of no interest to the medical profession and the cancer industry whatsoever!!

Does this look like an industry hell-bent on finding a cure for cancer?

Does this explain why deaths from cancer go on rising? And why treatments are only marginally better now than when President Nixon declared war on cancer back in 1971.

"Renewed focus on cancer" (Wikipedia)

"Recent years have seen an increased perception of a lack of progress in the war on cancer, and renewed motivation to confront the disease. On July 15, 2008, the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions convened a panel discussion titled, Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities in the 21st Century.[19] 
It included interviews with noted cancer survivors such as Arlen Specter, Elizabeth Edwards and Lance Armstrong,"(Quote)
(My emphasis added)

Noted cancer survivors? Unfortunately... two of the above proclaimed "cancer survivors", Arlen Specter and Elizabeth Edwards (who had had some apparent success with their cancer drugs treatment) died from cancer not long afterwards, when their cancer returned and spread...a common issue with chemotherapy. So they do consult with cancer survivors.... but only ones that have had chemotherapy. And two of the three "noted cancer survivors" sadly, were not survivors very long!

Note that anyone having conventional cancer treatment will be proclaimed as a success story (or cured) when they are still alive 5 years following diagnosis....when the clock starts ticking. However, as many cases of cancer are relatively easy to treat, like minor skin cancer issues, cancer statistics can be made to look far better that they actually are. Secondly...SOME such people (if their cancer was discovered very early), might conceivably still be alive 5 years on, even if their 'treatment' was shredded wheat!
Example: In my own case, Had I had a colonoscopy 6 years earlier than I actually did, my colon tumour would probably have been discovered at that time.. and the clock would have started ticking at that point. (Six years before actually found). The point being, that provided the cancer is detected early, being alive 5 years after discovery, is not always that difficult to achieve....if it is a slow growing cancer. (Whether taking chemo, or shredded wheat).

Alternative Cancer Treatments:

The objective of natural non-toxic cancer protocols is to eliminate cancer, and also create an internal terrain that is detoxified, healthy, alkaline, and generally unviable to cancer, (and its needs), along with a strong vital immune system.

 (None of these are achieved by chemotherapy of course. In fact it does the exact opposite!).

Researchers at the University of Victoria in British Columbia did a careful follow up study on 200 persons who underwent a "spontaneous remission of cancer". What did they find? They found that a whopping 87% of those people had switched diets, usually to a plant-based vegetarian type diet. Coincidence??? While nobody would suggest this, of itself, is a sure-fire way to cure cancer, it does however suggest it as a very important element, and possibly a key factor for helping to beat cancer. It certainly means you should abstain from eating highly processed DEAD foods that probably helped the cancer to get started in the first place! Most alternative cancer protocols have this as a starting point.  See:  Outsmart Your Cancer, by Tanya Harter Pierce

This guy followed similar advice... and his "baseball sized" tumour was eliminated. Would he still be alive had he been subjected to chemotherapy? That we will never know. But there is a good chance he might not.

(2 mins 44 secs)

To see many more video testimonials...see:

PROOF? Can Cancer be Cured Naturally? Evidence and Testimonials That Prove it Often Can be.

"Radical Remission: Surviving Cancer Against All Odds"

A new book by Dr. Kelly A. Turner

In her New York Times bestseller, Radical Remission: Surviving Cancer Against All Odds, Dr. Kelly A. Turner, founder of the Radical Remission Project, uncovers nine factors that can lead to a spontaneous remission from cancer—even after conventional medicine has failed.

While getting her Ph.D. at the University of California, Berkley, Dr. Turner, a researcher, lecturer, and counselor in integrative oncology, was shocked to discover that no one was studying episodes of radical (or unexpected) remission—when people recover against all odds without the help of conventional medicine, or after conventional medicine has failed. 

Turner points out in her book that not one doctor she asked who had personally witnessed a Radical Remission had tried to publish the case as a classic case study. She also points out that there are over 1,000 reports of "spontaneous remissions" that have been reported in the medical literature, but that they weren't being pursued by researchers as to the commonalities among them. Turner has done that!

Now that's what I'm talking about!!

No comments:

Post a Comment